She recently returned to speak with the insistence of the alleged clash of civilizations, between the East and the West. It would be more correct to say between Muslims and Westerners. In reality there is no difference between all religious practitioners, no matter what the name of the God worshiped.
Civil liberties conquered, were achieved despite the Church Catholic. Now self-styled political (alloy head, cause a strong anti-clerical) rant to the contrary. The fact is that our rights as citizens allows us to adjust as we please. Instead of faith. Catholicism is deeply intolerant as any other religion. Fortunately, it is frequented by a huge number of hypocrites who do not practice the precepts which claim to believe. We tend to fish here and there what he pleases and discard the rest. Some rules are respected because they are castrating of their individual freedoms. You go to church out of habit. sex is practiced without rules, in violation of the absurd precept of "sex only as a means of procreation." Absurd to me that I do not go to church for years, should not be for those who frequent certain places. Religious authority (the pope and various Ruini) are discriminated against homosexuals, unmarried, divorced, deny them access to the sacraments, although in reality only for ordinary mortals (see Berlusconi Pierferdinando-families and first-Casini example, divorced and always in the front row to communicate).
Often religion is used as a pretext even by our leaders. It is not necessary to go to Iran to see daily religious interference in secular life and a social state.
When, after a vote in parliament as important as the law on assisted procreation, I comment, with very complacency, from various Rutelli (former radical ...), Bobbi (Dl), Casini (UDC) and I stop because the list is endless, who voted according to their Catholic faith, makes me think that Italy is a Theocracy.
The debate on civil unions go on the electoral campaign, it is not yet arrived at a solution. I should mention that members of parliament already enjoy this privilege. Unlike us mere mortals, we have to listen to while you squabble by saying that civil unions are against Catholic morality. Not true, in my opinion. But even if it were? I understand that there is no state religion. Everyone is free to meet (or meet) any religious dogma. But if the same dogma becomes state law requires everyone to respect it. Following a public
Milena Gabbanelli article appeared about a year ago on Io Donna, Corriere della Sera insert. An alert: The title of this post is a joke of Daniel belongs to you.
Mrs. Adele Parrillo, two years ago, lost in Nasiriyah
her partner Stefano Rolla,
killed by a suicide attack with 18 compatriots.
But she is not entitled to compensation to be paid to relatives of other victims
, because the two were not married.
people living in Italy for many years even
outside the marriage can not apply for work permits epr
assist the partner who was seriously ill,
can not continue to live in the apartment of the deceased partner
without the permission of next of kin,
not entitled to survivor's pension. About 7 million
facto couples have to resort to
private contracts that have no legal value. In many European countries
the
civil solidarity pact (PACS) provides people who have lived together for more than three years
some of the economic rights that married people have the
. In Italy however,
outside marriage are guaranteed the rights of cohabiting
only to "elected". Elected to parliament! Indeed
senators and deputies may extend the supplementary health care
internal (And so far nothing to say
) to their partners, which can however enjoy
survivor's pension. It 'just a coexistence of written communication
that the lawmaker's request. Today the same detractors of
pacs, and lay Catholics have not asked
the abolition of this regulation. It takes a
cheek, not to say something else, to
not extend to all a privilege to montecitorio
has been around for 10 (ten) years!
0 comments:
Post a Comment